American College of Preventive Medicine
Policy Resolution # 01-02(A)


TITLE:
AUTHOR:
DATE:

Develop the New Frontier of Electronic Interactions
Phillip C. Gioia, MD MPH, FACPM, FAAP
January 20, 2001 (Revised February 4, 2001)



WHEREAS:
1) electronic interactions when done securely and efficiently will benefit the knowledge and data needs of our world
2) electronic interactions currently often lack appropriate security and efficiency
3) electronic knowledge bases often lack verifiable authenticity and ease of use
4) electronic data is often in forms incompatible with electronic systems at the point of use
5) with diminished energy and natural resources productivity must be improved to maintain our current standard of living and improve the resources available to other peoples of the world
6) health care errors in the United States alone cause about 90,000 deaths a year(Institue of Medicine: To Err Is Human, 1999 )
7) duplications of immunizations, laboratory tests, history taking, and physical examinations add to rapidly increasing health expenditures without improving health
8) omissions of cost effective preventive interventions and/or services for high risk individuals increase the resource use for all
9) the AMA Council on Medical Services (CMS Report 10/A-00/ June 2000 at http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/3776.html) in their "Electronic Medical Record Systems Report" and the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/hipaa000706.pdf) in their report to the Secretary of HHS on July 6,2000 on "Uniform Data Systems for Patient Medical Record Information" both note insufficient standards from HL 7 and ANSI and call for the creation of an electronic medical record format to be used the multitude of vendors and to be available at low cost to all providers and health departments.(for HIPPA - standards have been set for health business type transactions only for 2002)
10) other organizations lack the comprehensive approach to infrastructure problems, cultural change, cost effectiveness evaluation, and the broad expertise needed to deal with government, industry, and all medical specialties

Therefore, be it RESOLVED that:
1) the ACPM should work with the AMA, Intel, FCC (Federal Communications Commission), and to develop useable standards of security, authenticity and reliability of electronic interactions (the AMA and Intel have already started a secure electronic physician identification system)
2) the ACPM should guarantee the electronic medical record systems (EMRS) emphasizes prevention and high quality efficient health care and is accessible to all people and providers
3) the ACPM with the AMA, AMIA (American Medical Informatics Association), HCFA (NCVHS), WHO, and others should develop an analysis of the system (box diagrams) and design (Preliminary Design Language or flow charts) the basic structure for EMRS
a) develop a basic consensus structure for health data
b) develop standards for structure and reliability for knowledge
c) develop security standards for the public, patients, and providers of care (private and community)
d) design easy to use quality control for life style and health care
e) develop standards of electronic communications between/among the public, patients, and providers and their data systems
4) the ACPM must ensure that data and knowledge in such systems must be audited, verifiable, and corrected in a timely fashion
a) all parties involved in data elements would have secure access and a method to correct or indicate suspected errors
b) knowledge bases would be maintained continuously
5) such developed software and knowledge systems would be available to members of the developing organizations at a discounted user fee
6) the ACPM should work with other health care organizations and industry to fund the coding (the detailed programming) publicly and cooperatively among many vendors and/or government. The basic rules and communication protocols of this EMRS would be free but government, providers and payor would save by decreasing transaction costs, preventing disease, injuries and duplication. Vendors would make money on providing hardware, communication links, and setting up the standard shared software on the hardware. Optional expensive add ons to a basic alpha numeric system, such as graphic capture and storage might also be sold.