| 01-01(I)
|
Health
Care for All 101
John T Ashley MD, MBA, FACPM
Robert H. LeBow, MD, MPH
Robert T. Pero, MD, MPH
|
|
RESOLVES
THAT: The ACPM develop a
complete proposal to present to
Congress for the purpose of
enacting universal coverage, a
proposal which could be called
Health Insurance for All (HIFA).
THAT:
This proposal would:
- Guarantee
health insurance for all US
residents.
- End
the responsibility of US
industry to provide health
insurance benefits.
- Create
a tax-based (like Medicare)
health insurance program
funded by the federal
government and/or the states.
- Build
on the current strengths of
American health care
professionals and institutions
to deliver quality, scientific
based care and prevention.
- Utilize
the strengths of American
health insurers to
administrate the system.
- Minimize
the economic incentives or
disincentives to either
over-utilize marginally
effective services or
underutilize proven beneficial
services.
- Allow
flexibility at the state level
– except for mandating
universal coverage.
THAT:
Some of the agreed-upon
principles (by the authors of
this resolution) of this
proposal would include –
subject to modification and/or
development in more detail by an
ACPM committee:
- Federally
funded health insurance
coverage for all residents
of the USA with a single
risk-pool that enrolls every
resident automatically
(details of enrollment to be
worked out) in an Essential
Health Insurance (?Care)
Package (EHIP) in the state
where the individual
resides.
- The
proposal could cover all
residents initially, or
phase in some already
covered groups step-wise,
such as Medicare, the VA,
and military populations.
- The
EHIP would have no premiums;
would include primary care,
essential specialist care,
hospitalizations, and
pharmaceuticals; proven
preventive care; mental
health with parity; basic
dental care.
- There
would be no deductibles and
minimal co-payments for
essential services, with a
mechanism to waive
co-payments as deemed
necessary. [ACPM policy in
1993 stated that basic
preventive services should
be delivered "free of
any co-payment."]
- Discretionary
specialty services would
have higher co-payments.
- Creation
of a national board for
oversight, regulation, and
design of the benefit
package.
- EHIP
financed through a
progressive payroll tax (or
self-employment tax) on all
income, collected similar to
social security and Medicare
taxes.
- Supplemental
insurance, for services or
co-payments not covered in
the EHIP, would be sold on
the private market.
Employers could opt to buy
supplemental insurance for
non-covered services.
- Current
employer contributions for
health insurance should be
converted to increased wages
for employees.
- Provision
for capture of the
tax-exemption (currently
amounts to about $125
Billion a year) in the
financing of this plan.
- Enrollment
process to be developed.
Could provide role for
current insurers in
enrollment as well as
administration.
- Rates
and reimbursements
negotiated between the EHIP
administrators and health
care
professionals/institutions.
Could be fee-for-service or
capitation, or other
negotiated payment
mechanism.
- Enrollees
have full choice of provider
participating with chosen
insurer.
- Long
term care to be integrated
into package when feasible
with current Medicare and
Medicaid long term care
programs retained until
altered.
- States
responsible to monitor and
regulate insurers in each
state and allowed
flexibility to add needed
benefits, e.g., as with
current Medicaid recipients.
- Assume
continued federal/state
support for delivery systems
for special populations
(e.g., Migrant/Community
Health Centers, Health Care
for the Homeless, Public
Health Clinics).
- Funding
for prevention and public
health, as well as
educational programs, to be
included within this
financing system – but not
excluding other funding as
well.
- Federal
government to monitor and
regulate state performance
in assuring access and
quality of care to residents
of the states.
THAT:
The ACPM work with other
professional (?and community)
organizations to form a broad base
of lobbying support for this
Health Insurance for All plan.
THAT:
The ACPM form a committee to
develop this proposal in detail to
present it to our membership for
approval.
|
|
ACTION
TAKEN:
The ACPM Policy
Committee deferred action on this
resolution until the Open Policy
Forum at Preventive Medicine
2002 (February 20-24,
2002, in San Antonio, Texas). |
|
REMARKS:
This
resolution was the product of
several months of collaboration
and dialogue by the authors, who
had submitted somewhat similar,
but separate, resolutions for
consideration at the 2001 Open
Policy Forum. At that time, the
Policy Committee referred both
resolutions back to the authors
and urged them to coordinate their
efforts and resubmit a combined,
refined resolution. As a result of
concerns about the scope and role
of ACPM expressed by the committee
via the listserv prior to the
October 21 meeting, Dr. LeBow
addressed the committee and urged
ACPM to consider at least adopting
the principles and supporting
other organizations’ and
coalitions’ advocacy efforts
consistent with these principles.
The committee questioned how these
principles matched up with other
organizations’ reform proposals
(e.g., AMA) and expressed some
additional concerns about some of
the all-payer principles. One
committee member suggested ACPM
consider a more targeted approach,
such as the "MediKids Health
Insurance Act of 2001"
currently being considered by
Congress. Dr. LeBow reiterated
that the proposed resolution seeks
revolutionary system changes, with
a focus on primary and secondary
prevention for the whole
population, not a tinkering around
the edges for one segment of the
population. The committee decided
to defer action until the spring
meetings of the committee and Open
Policy Forum and urged the authors
to do additional research into how
their principles compare to other
organization/coalition reform
proposals. |
| 02-01(I)
|
Support
for Abstinence Education Programs
Marcela Meyer, MD, MPH,
FACPM
|
|
RESOLVES
THAT,
the
ACPM go on record as approving
those Abstinence Education
Programs for young people which
incorporate the 8 criteria for
federal-to-state funding for
Abstinence Education programs as
stated in Section 510(b)(2) of the
Welfare Reform Act of 1996 which
amends Title V of the Social
Security Act (see attachment to
resolution). |
|
ACTION TAKEN:
ACPM did not adopt this
resolution. |
|
REMARKS:
This
same resolution was submitted to
ACPM and considered by the Policy
Committee in February 2001. ACPM
decided not to adopt it at that
time as well. However, because the
author was not able to present the
resolution in February, and an
evaluation of her sexual
abstinence program had been
completed since that time, she
opted to resubmit it for
consideration. At the October 21
meeting, she and her colleague
presented the resolution and the
results of the evaluation survey
that demonstrated program success.
Policy Committee members raised
concerns about the validity of the
survey evaluation results and
methodology. The committee also
noted the resolution’s stance
against sexual activity in all
cases except for marriage and felt
that marriage excluded certain
segments (e.g., gay and lesbian)
of the population. The committee
felt that ACPM could only support
abstinence as part of a more
comprehensive sexual education
program, and encouraged the author
to consider raising the issue at
ACPM’s Open Policy Forum in
February 2002. |
| 03-01(I)
|
ACPM
Emergency Resolution to Strengthen
Preventive Medicine as a Medical
Specialty
Joel L. Nitzkin, MD, MPH,
DPA, FACPM
|
|
RESOLVES
THAT,
- THAT,
the ACPM Policy Committee and
Board declare that an
emergency situation exists in
which other business of ACPM
must be declared lower in
priority to the action needed
to immediately strengthen the
specialty of preventive
medicine.
- THAT,
resources be immediately
deployed to rapidly and fully
implement the entire workplan
of the Job Market Intiative (JMI)
– including
- Web
site, job listings,
- Outreach
to actual and potential
employers of PM physicians,
- Outreach
and liaison to other
national organizations and
- Development
of postgraduate fellowship
opportunities.
- That,
in addition to the JMI agenda,
action be initiated, renewed
or dramatically enhanced on
the following fronts:
- To
convince the ACGME RRC
(Residency Review Committee)
of the importance of formal
recognition of the
non-clinical portions of PH
and PM residency training
programs
- To
fully engage ACPM (and
possibly other PM national
organizations) in
- The
APHA/ASPH project to
"certify" public
health professionals.
- The
CDC-associated public
health workforce
enumeration project
- National
deliberations on
institutional response to
bioterrorism and the
provision of the
leadership and technical
staff needed to assure
appropriate response in
public health, academic,
healthcare delivery and
other settings
- To
secure and enhance funding
for PM residency training
programs, with special
emphasis on those oriented
toward development of
leadership staff for state
and local health departments
- To
explore both formal and
informal means by which we
can redevelop Public Health
as a subspecialty of
Preventive Medicine – and
implement these means in a
way that will enable us to
assure state and local
governments of the
qualifications of PH
physicians board certified
in PM
- To
begin the process of
redeveloping all PM training
programs to meet the needs
of the job marketplace and
to identify the ways in
which the knowledge and
skills needed to fill all
potential PH/PM physician
job niches can be offered in
PH/PM training programs, at
MPH, residency and
continuing education levels.
This will require the
following steps
- Identifying
the jobs that should
require or prefer PM
physicians in the job
specifications
- To
identify the knowledge and
skills required for such
jobs
- To
develop the educational
programming to teach such
knowledge and hone the
skills under skilled
mentorship in the context
of PM residency training
programs
- To
enhance and accelerate
development of part-time and
off-site PM training
opportunities as a path to
PM Board certification by
currently employed PM
physicians and non-PM
physicians who might seek
such training and
certification
- To
take these and other steps
necessary to create a
situation in which PM
training and Board
Certification is of
substantial value to PM
physicians seeking PM
related jobs
- That
ACPM play the lead role to
enlist the active
participation of sister
preventive medicine, public
health and medical
organizations in this effort.
- That
ACPM play the lead role in
enlisting the active
participation of ACPM members
and their respective
institutional employers in
academic, public health,
healthcare delivery,
industrial and other settings
to further this agenda.
|
|
ACTION
TAKEN:
The Board passed the following
Resolves in lieu of the proposed
ACPM resolution: (1) THAT, the
ACPM Board recognize the urgent
need to strengthen the specialty
of preventive medicine as a top
priority of the College, (2) THAT,
the ACPM Board, appropriate
committees, and staff work with
sister preventive medicine, public
health, and medical organizations
to accomplish this goal, and (3)
THAT, the details of adoption and
implementation of specific action
be referred to the Board/Executive
Committee and be determined by the
February 2002 Board meeting. |
|
REMARKS:
The
Policy Committee expressed some
concerns with the specific details
within the proposed resolution,
such as use of the term
"Board eligibility" and
misrepresentation of the roles of
the ACGME Preventive Medicine RRC.
After discussion about adopting a
more general resolve to deem the
status of the specialty of
preventive medicine a top priority
for the College and refer the
details of an action plan to an
ACPM committee(s), the Policy
Committee recommended the
resolution be adopted as
submitted. However, the Board
expressed concerns with numerous
provisions within the body of the
resolution and agreed to support
the thrust of the resolution, but
not the itemized details as
presented. The adopted action
taken reflects the Board’s
sentiments. |
For
more information, contact Mike
Barry.
|