October 2007
Compiled by Rob Lipsitz, MD, MPH
Resident, Pfizer Practicum Rotation in Health Policy and Preventive Medicine

ACPM periodically compiles and abstracts journal articles of interest to preventive medicine physicians. The latest entries include articles on cancer risk, prostrate cancer, asthma rates in 9/11 workers, obesity and soft drink consumption.

SMOKING MAY CAUSE PERMANENT DAMAGE TO GENES CAUSING LIFELONG CANCER RISK

DEBATE CONTINUES OVER EFFICACY OF PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING

Swiss study finds prostatectomy may afford best opportunity for long-term prostate cancer survival

9/11 RESCUE AND RECOVERY WORKERS HAVE HIGHER RATES OF ASTHMA

OBESITY TRANSMITTED VIA NETWORKING

SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK FOR METABOLIC SYNDROME FOR MIDDLE AGED ADULTS

 

SMOKING MAY CAUSE PERMANENT DAMAGE TO GENES CAUSING LIFELONG CANCER RISK

The August 2007 issue of BMC Genomics suggests smoking permanently alters some genes leading to a lifelong risk of lung cancer.

Investigators at the British Columbia Cancer Research Center, British Columbia, Canada found expression of GSK3B was irreversibly decreased in smokers. GSK3B is a gene which inhibits COX2 expression which is viewed to play a significant role in development of cancer in the endothelial lining of the lung.

The authors conclude that expression levels of some of the genes related to tobacco smoking return to levels similar to non-smokers upon cessation of smoking, while expression of others such as the GSK3B appear to be permanently altered despite prolonged smoking cessation. These irreversible changes may account for the persistent lung cancer risk despite smoking cessation.

Chari R et al. "Effect of active smoking on the human bronchial epithelium transcriptome." BMC Genomics 2007; 297: doi:10.1186/1471-2164-8-297

Table of Contents
 

DEBATE CONTINUES OVER EFFICACY OF PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING

In the August issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, investigators published results of a study which found that there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of interval cancer or aggressive cancer between men screened every two years vs. those screened every four years with PSA testing. 

This study was done as part of the larger European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Researchers in Sweden and the Netherlands compared cumulative incidence of interval cancer in men screening for prostate cancer every two or four years. 4202 men in Gothernberg, Sweden were screened every two years and 13301 men in Rotterdam, Netherlands  were screened every four. The investigators found the 10-year cumulative incidence of all prostate cancers in Rotterdam versus Gothenburg was 1118 (8.41%) versus 552 (13.14%) (P<.001), the cumulative incidence of interval cancer was 57 (0.43%) versus 31 (0.74%) (P = .51), and the cumulative incidence of aggressive interval cancer was 15 (0.11%) versus 5 (0.12%) (P = .72).

While this study provides evidence to limit PSA screening to every four years, the overarching question, ‘is prostate cancer screening efficacious?’ remains unanswered.

Roobol MJ, Grenabo J, Schröder FH, Hugosson J. Interval cancers in prostate cancer screening: comparing 2- and 4-year screening intervals in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Gothenburg and Rotterdam. In: J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 99:1296–303.

Table of Contents


Swiss study finds prostatectomy may afford best opportunity for long-term prostate cancer survival

In a new study published in the October Archives of Internal Medicine investigators found that individuals undergoing a prostatectomy for prostate cancer had a significantly lower risk of dying from the cancer when compared to those who had radiotherapy or opted for watchful waiting.

In the Swiss based study researches used a population-based cohort of all 844 Geneva patients having a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1998.  Treatments followed were prostatectomy (n = 158), radiotherapy (n = 205), watchful waiting (n = 378), hormone therapy (n = 72), and other types of therapy (n = 31). They found treatment options minimally affected 5-year prostate cancer specific mortality but had a significant effect on long-term mortality. For patients who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, and watchful waiting,  respectively ten-year specific survival was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-93%), 75% (95% CI, 67%-83%), and 72% (95% CI, 66%-80%). At 10 years radiotherapy and watchful waiting patients’ risk of death from prostate cancer was significantly increased when compared with patients who underwent prostatectomy (multi-adjusted hazard ratio, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.2-4.3] and 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1-3.8]). It was noted that the radiotherapy and watchful waiting mortality increase was mostly seen in patients with poorly differentiated cancer and those younger than 70.

Arnaud Merglen, MD; Franz Schmidlin, MD; Gerald Fioretta, BSc; Helena M. Verkooijen, MD, PhD; Elisabetta Rapiti, MD, MPH; Roberto Zanetti, MD; Raymond Miralbell, MD; Christine Bouchardy, MD, MPH, Short- and Long-term Mortality With Localized Prostate Cancer, Arch Intern Med. 2007;167: 1944-1950.

Table of Contents


9/11 RESCUE AND RECOVERY WORKERS HAVE HIGHER RATES OF ASTHMA  

A large retrospective cohort reported in the August issue of Environmental Health Perspectives found that the rate of self-reported newly-diagnosed asthma in 9/11 rescue and recovery workers was twelve times higher then the general population.

Researchers reviewed interview data from 29,626 participants of the World Trade Center Health Registry (WTCHR). Variables studied included gender, age, NYC residence status on September 11, 2001, education, affiliated organization at the WTC site, smoking status, exposure to the initial dust cloud, first date of work, work history on the pile, use of masks and respirators, and asthma history. Those under age 18, with a prior history of asthma and/or missing any of the analytic variable data were excluded.

The researchers asked “Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you had asthma?” If registrants responded positively, they were asked to further specify, “Did a doctor or other health professional first tell you that you had asthma before 9/11 or after 9/11?” They defined newly diagnosed asthma as cases diagnosed after September 11, 2001.

They found 926 registrants reported being told they had asthma for the first time after September 11, 2001, which was equivalent to a three-year risk of 3.6%. This was twelve times higher than the expected 0.3% three-year risk of asthma, based on the reported incidence of asthma in the general adult population of 100/100,000 person-years. Interestingly the frequency of workers reporting newly-diagnosed asthma increased with arrival dates closer to the time of the collapse and with longer duration of work. The highest three-year risk of newly-diagnosed asthma was reported by workers who arrived on September 11 and worked over 90 days. 

The authors conclude the findings underscore the need for adequate and timely distribution of appropriate protective equipment, and the enforcement of its use when other methods of controlling respiratory exposures are not feasible.

Wheeler K, et al, Asthma Diagnosed after September 11, 2001 among Rescue and Recovery Workers: Findings from the World Trade Center Health Registry

Environmental Health Perspectives doi:10.1289/ehp.10248 (available at http://dx.doi.org/), Online 27 August 2007

Table of Contents

OBESITY TRANSMITTED VIA NETWORKING

A study published in the July 26th issue of the New England Journal of Medicine found that “networking phenomena” appear to be relevant to the biologic and behavioral trait of obesity, and obesity appears to spread through social ties.

The study looked at individual weight gain over 32 years and compared it with the individual’s ‘network’; friends, siblings, spouse, and neighbors. The researchers evaluated 12,067 people numerous times between 1971-2003 as part of the Framingham Heart Study in which BMI was the key data point followed. They used a longitudinal statistical mode to evaluate densely interconnected social networks. They found ‘discernible clusters of obese persons (as defined by BMI) were present in the network at all time points, and the clusters extended to three degrees of separation.’

If a friend became obese in a given interval, the chance of becoming obese increased by 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6 to 123). The chance of becoming obese if one sibling became obese was increased by 40% (95% CI, 21 to 60). If one spouse became obese, the likelihood that the other spouse would become obese increased by 37% (95% CI, 7 to 73). Neighbors in the immediate geographic location of these individuals did not have the same effect. There was a relatively greater influence on each other among persons of the same sex compared to those of the opposite sex. There appeared to be no correlation between obesity and smoking cessation within the network. The researchers concluded, ‘network phenomena appear to be relevant to the biologic and behavioral trait of obesity, and obesity appears to spread through social ties’.

Christakis NA, Fowler JH The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 years N Engl J Med 357:370, July 26, 2007

Table of Contents
 

SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK FOR METABOLIC SYNDROME FOR MIDDLE AGED ADULTS

A recent study in Circulation analyzed soft drink consumption and development of Metabolic Syndrome in Middle Aged Americans. They found that consumption of soft drinks in quantities greater then or equal to one per day gave an increased risk for metabolic syndrome in adults. Further it was noticed that the association was significant regardless of whether the soft drink was diet or not.

Previous research has shown that there is a positive association between soft drink consumption and obesity in children and adolescents but there was no related research for adults. The researchers utilized the Framingham Offspring Study (FOS) cohort to prospectively follow soft drink consumption and development of metabolic syndrome. Since the FOS did not specify diet vs. non diet beverages, the researchers used the Food Frequency Questionnaire to discriminate type of soft drink.

Of the original 10,130 FOS cohort members, 6039 were enrolled in the study after excluding those with CVD, metabolic syndrome (MS) and incomplete covariate data. A four year interval was used to evaluate for development of MS. They found Individuals who consumed at least 1 soft drink per day had a 44% higher adjusted risk (95% CI, 20% to 74%) of developing metabolic syndrome compared with infrequent drinkers in multivariable-adjusted analyses. They noted no effect modification by age, body mass index, or sex. They additionally adjusted for blood sugar, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL-C, and alcohol consumption noting  the incidence of metabolic syndrome remained robust (odds ratio [OR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.19, 1.74).

The researches postulated three reasons for the associated risk being physiologic, dietary and economic. Physiologic refers to caloric intake related to high fructose corn syrup consumption. Dietary factors related to soda consumption act as a marker for poor dietary habits, so regardless if drinking diet soda or not, overall diet is poor. Economic incentives can lead to a soft drink consumption choice as they are cheaper then healthier but more expensive beverage options. 

Dhingra, et al, Soft Drink Consumption and Risk of Developing Cardio-metabolic Risk Factors and the Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged Adults in the Community Circulation. 2007 Jul 31; 116(5):480-8. Epub 2007 Jul 23

Table of Contents